Corrections & Editorial Standards

AI Expert News covers a fast-moving industry where facts change quickly and source material is often incomplete. We make mistakes. When we do, we want to fix them publicly and quickly. This page describes how.

Reporting an error

If you spot a factual error, missing context, or misattribution in any article: email [email protected]. Include the article URL and the specific issue.

We respond to every correction request, usually within 48 hours. We do not require you to be the subject of the article or to have a credential — anyone can report a problem.

How we handle corrections

Factual errors

If we get a fact wrong — a number, a date, a quote, a name, an attribution — we update the article and add a clearly labeled correction note at the bottom of the piece. The original wording is preserved in the note. We do not silently edit articles after publication.

Missing context

If an article is technically accurate but omits important context that changes the meaning, we add an editor's note at the top of the article explaining what was missing and what was added.

Significant errors

If a substantial claim is wrong — something material to the conclusion of the piece — we issue a public correction, mark the article with a banner at the top, and link to the correction from our homepage for at least 48 hours.

Retractions

If an article is fundamentally unsound — a claim we cannot verify, a source we cannot confirm — we retract it. The article is replaced with a retraction notice explaining what was wrong, why we published it, and what we are doing to prevent the same mistake.

Our editorial process

Every article on AI Expert News goes through a multi-step editorial pipeline before publication:

1. Drafting. An initial draft is produced, working from primary source material wherever possible.
2. Fact check. Every factual claim is extracted, classified by risk level, and verified against source material before publication.
3. Editorial audit. Drafts are reviewed against our voice and accuracy standards: no hype language, no unverified statistics, no partisanship, plain language for non-technical readers.
4. Human review. A human editor reviews the final draft before it goes live.

This process catches most errors before publication. The corrections process catches what the pipeline misses.

What we do not do

• We do not silently edit articles to remove errors after publication.
• We do not delete articles to hide mistakes. Retractions stay live with the explanation.
• We do not refuse correction requests because the requester disagrees with our framing or conclusions. Disagreements about interpretation are different from factual errors — both are welcome, but only factual errors trigger a correction.

Sources and attribution

When we report a fact from another publication, we link to it. When we summarize a study, we link to the study. When we quote a person, we attribute the quote and link to the source. If we have made an attribution error or missed a citation, we want to know.

Conflicts of interest

If we cover a company we have a commercial relationship with, we disclose the relationship in the article. See our Affiliate Disclosure for the full list of current commercial relationships.

Contact

Corrections: [email protected]
General editorial: [email protected]
Anything else: [email protected]